one of the few who still reads these?
I don't have to be PC so let me just say it how it is: Young naive writer https://twitter.com/AlyssaHertig gets handed narrative by the paper. Writes some stupid shit, gets paid by VC indirectly for protecting the portfolio (because IOTA is a threat to the entire portfolio). Slap a graphic on top of it. Done.
I agree that there is no "grand conspiracy" to damage the IF. It's regular business for coindesk at this point. https://www.coindesk.com/iota-2-7-billion-cryptocurrency-developers-love-hate/
Attacking IOTA on a scientific level ended with self inflicted academic fraud (allegedly), exposing bad actors and destroyed reputations, while educating the IOTA community about the protocol itself. If the media didn't spin the DCI/IOTA incident, it would have been an absolute PR bloodbath for DCI. The new angle is: hurt the IF by making it look like a toxic environment for developers.
That's why month old screenshots are being digged out. This is FUD with surgical precision because developers engaging with the IOTA protocol is one of the more underrated but really fucking important factors.
Thanks to the first steps in making the IF more transparent however, we now know over that 1300+ developers/creators are part of the Ecosystem. https://ecosystem.iota.org Yes, you should boycott Coindesk. No, it's not childish. You should generally avoid all bad press as it's a waste of time.
If the first newspaper you’ve read was on an iPad you might not know this: Serious newspapers label articles, in which the writer states his/her opinion on the topic he/she is reporting on, AS SUCH.
Those are often referred to as “Opinion Pieces” or a “Comment”. However... Most crypto news sites are simply a vehicle to push undisclosed native advertisement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_advertising [Native advertising is a type of advertising, mostly online, that matches the form and function of the platform upon which it appears.]
... [a clear disclosure is deemed necessary when employing native marketing strategy in order to protect the consumer from being deceived]
... [According to Federal Trade Commission, means of disclosure include visual cues, labels, and other techniques.]
here is a good example of a native advertisement: https://www.coindesk.com/circle-adds-zcash-crypto-investment-app/
If a news outlet is NOT even labeling opinion pieces as such - it’s not worth your time. It will add more confusion than clarity. Because that’s what it’s designed to do.
Let's see if we can spot the difference between professional and fraud:
see how finder.com.au is very clear about everything? Opinion and disclosure? TNW not so much...
ok, let's never talk about this again! Let's finally move on.
We should stay healthy skeptics towards corporate adoption. Friendly reminder the IF exists mainly to push back on corporate agendas.
For all we know, some just do it for the extra likes on twitter because of a #IOTA hashtag. Rarely do corporate SM accounts enjoy this kind of attention.
If you think i'm being anti-corporate libtardish, consider this: Industry 4.0 needs IOTA more than IOTA needs them. https://twitter.com/Schuldensuehnestatus/989738856298659841
Not only to stay competitive but also to not get hacked and shut down by “insert country”. Bosch, Fujitsu and DXC are maybe the first to realize this. SO PLEASE stop begging on social media and tweeting at Elon Musk about IOTA. It’s not a good look.
that being said: Institutional money and regulation is the hot topic right now.
And most likely will be during 2018. BTC Futures showed a recent spike in Volume hinting at smart money flowing in: https://twitter.com/CryptoKinky/status/989569263383011328
(dont judge me for my resources i cant afford nice looking charts)
There are several news articles about WS traders moving to crypto and so on. Looks like things are starting to get rolling in the institutional world, as infrastructure is being set up.
Contrary to popular tinfoilery belief (aka. "The Cartel" Medium Article, that all of Bitcoin is 100% manipulated already based on future contracts)
, futures had relatively small volume compared to the global btc volume - most likely not important enough to justify manipulation of the entire market. https://bitcoinaverage.com/en/bitcoin-price/btc-to-usd
Even the SEC Chairman Jay Clayton stated that futures market is "quite small" in his public statement before the february hearing: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/opagiancarlo37 It is important to put the new Bitcoin futures market in perspective. It is quite small with open interest at the CME of 6,695 bitcoin14 and at Cboe Futures Exchange (Cboe) of 5,569 bitcoin (as of Feb. 2, 2018). At a price of approximately $7,700 per Bitcoin,15 this represents a notional amount of about $94 million.
If you believe in a paradigm shift, this means we are still early.
Recent regulatory voices and twitter drama led to this piece by https://coincenter.org/entry/no-ether-is-not-a-security
Why is this important? Companies in the US most likely are patient about making an investment into any crypto token as there is regulatory uncertainty.
DXC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, showcased a PoC with IOTA. At Q4 in december, DXC has stated
: 213 Million in Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1688568/000168856818000007/dxc1231201710-q.htm
Just some food for thought:
If you are already spending opportunity cost on IOTA, why wouldn't you leverage that with the token. Bosch invested into the token as well, most likely because there is more regulatory certainty in germany. Fujitsu wants to roll out IOTA as an industry standard (as it seems). This is not your regular Shitcoin. There is a reason dumb money is called dumb.
Last time i check Verge had 10x the volume on binance compared to IOTA.
There are no fundamentals yet in evaluation, it’s purely speculative - but with more institutions moving into the space this might change. As such, CCs with industrial use could likely see a reevaluation. But, looking in from the outside, there seem to be some hurdles.
this twitter account is one of the more resourceful ones, he lets out some numbers to boost his SM traction (god bless him) https://twitter.com/joel_john95
as outsiders, this will be an extremely helpful resource. He tweeted out a quarterly report https://medium.com/outlier-ventures-io/state-of-blockchains-q1-2018-1efe284572c1
he writes: Over $1.8 billion has been invested into firms working with the blockchain ecosystem through corporate venture capital to date.
That’s not that much. Is it. For the entire ecosystem? Friendly reminder snapchat, after a 20% fall, is a 15 billion company. Just to get some perspective.
Especially if you consider the crypto market is still in the hands of leveraged daytraders on bitmex and whales, who got big stacks in a coin early on.
Imagine you want to invest 3M into IOTA as a CVC, you would’t spin up Binance and hit marketorder. You contact the IF and see if you can buy some, or outlier ventures might want to part with some, or even the founders i imagine hold quite a substantial amount.
I often see people asking for more exchanges - that's kinda missing the point. What you want at this point is more institutional interest. That's the kind of demand we want. Thats what you would call "organic growth" i guess.
Ripple holders, thinking a coinbase listening would make XRP go to $10, fail understand that Ripple itself holds a substantial amount of tokens where VCs can go and buy in bulk. And that’s why XRP is such a Shitcoin in the first place.
Cool thing about open ledgers is that you can look at them. Go figure. https://arewedecentralizedyet.com/
Ripple and XLM look extremely bad with over 90% of coins held in the top 100 addresses (shitcoins confirmed). TRX and EOS don’t even have a mainnet yet to really track it - so you can imagine the numbers are likely shit too. ADA is looking way better than IOTA in terms of wealth distribution. But 60% for whales, IF and Founders is probably better than what most projects can show for.
Thing is, the small guys got in on crypto first. Not the banks, not a selected silicon valley investor boisclub either. While this is good for us, it's a nightmare for investment banks and such.
JPMorgan admitted that in their “BTC Bible” saying: Ownership is highly concentrated. The opportunity set around direct CC trading appears relatively limited for banks
(Think about that for a second.)
CVC investing into the token could be, in my speculative opinion, the most likely catalyst for the price of IOTA, as its industrial adoption can build a synergy for entire sectors. As the main argument for Bitcoin is price uncorrelation to legacy assets, IOTA might be an interesting pick for the smart money, as it could be one of the few CCs with actual fundamental impact on different industry sectors. Something Blockchain, after 10 years, has failed to do.
Let me summarize because i was a bit all over the place. Things i will look for going forward:
- Institutional infrastructure is being built as we speak as regulations get more clear
- 2018 might see the highest investments into the blockchain ecosphere
- Financial talent from legacy market is switching to crypto
- Retail investors are the early adopters, not exclusive silicon valley boiclubs
- Liquidity is really bad, its hard to buy a lot of crypto for institutions
- The real FOMO and bubble might come with the “smart” money
- IF addressing wealth distribution and being more transparent
(i do not have a finance background as you can see and i write these to offer some interesting links and resources you might find useful in your own research.)
Binance aims to protect its users and investors by being strict with its requirements. Ironically, all of these guidelines would not allow the most successful cryptocurrency of them all to be listed. Bitcoin is missing one key part of the application process: the creator himself has disappeared so they can't submit an application. In the future, Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies might be controlling the world's financial system and transactions. No one will be able to buy or sell anything without this "Mark of the Beast". We don't know if bitcoin or other cryptocurrency is the "Mark of the Beast" that the bible talks about. But I'm sure in near future this "Mark of the ... Within the Bitcoin genesis block, a message was left by Satoshi, forever written in history. Within the coinbase parameter, along with the regular block data, the following message was included (a headline from The Times). The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks. This message was likely included as a timestamp to prove that the block was not created before the 3rd ... Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, And The Bible – A Summary. In conclusion, of course bitcoin is not directly mentioned in the Bible. However, because bitcoin is essentially a new form of money, we can take what the Bible says about money and apply it in this case. There are both positive and negative sides to getting involved with bitcoin as a Christian. Instead of just bitcoin and Ethereum, Binance is also now offering Ripple and the stablecoin USD coin. Ripple is being offered in two trading pairs, while USD coin is being offered in seven trading pairs which include Binance Coin, Bitcoin, Tether, Stellar, EOS, Ethereum, and Ripple. Concerns About Brexit . Binance’s expansion into the European market follows the footsteps of other exchanges ... Binance Coin $ 27.76 6.54%. Polkadot $ 4.22 7.13%. Litecoin $ 58.48 11.72%. Cardano $ 0.096858 4.52%. Alle Kurse . Die Bitcoin-Bibel – unser neues Testament (2018) Startseite; Aktuelle Artikel im Überblick; Krypto; Bitcoin; Die Bitcoin-Bibel – unser neues Testament (2018) von Mark Preuss. Am 13. Mai 2018 30. Juni 2019 · Lesezeit: 3 Minuten. Mark Preuss. Mark Preuss ist Gründer und ... Binance Coin $ 28.04 5.89%. Crypto.com Coin $ 0.167921 1.98%. Litecoin $ 48.85 1.59%. Alle Kurse. BTC-ECHO veröffentlicht “Die Bitcoin Bibel – Das Buch zur digitalen Währung” Startseite; Aktuelle Artikel im Überblick; Buchvorstellung; BTC-ECHO veröffentlicht “Die Bitcoin Bibel – Das Buch zur digitalen Währung” von Dr. Philipp Giese. Am 24. Juni 2016 30. Juni 2019 · Lesezeit ... Cryptocurrency Trading Bible Four: Geheimnisse der Bitmex-Meister . Außerdem hat es die niedrigste Abnehmergebühr der Welt, insbesondere für BTC/USD-Paare, und die Benutzeroberfläche ist im Vergleich zu den anderen vergleichbaren Unternehmen sehr gut. Probieren Sie BaseFEX also einmal aus. Binance hat bereits mehrere Filialmärkte eröffnet, darunter Binance Jersey, sowie eine nicht ... Oct 31, 2019 - Explore Bitcoin's board "Binance", followed by 54868 people on Pinterest. See more ideas about Buy bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, Blockchain. Since Binance are in the startup phase, the fees really are some of the least expensive out there. Binance charge nothing for new deposits of coins onto the platform and just 0.1% on the value of trades. To put this in perspective – if you were to use your Bitcoin to buy $100 of Ethereum, Binance would charge you 10 cents.
This is an educational video on bitcoin mining of binance pool and not a financial advice. #Binance #BinancePool #Binance pool If you want to sign up to Bina... Binance X Fellow: Patrick McCorry (https://twitter.com/paddypisa) and Sergi Delgado (https://twitter.com/sr_gi) PISA is a financially accountable watching se... Auf Binance habt ihr jetzt auch die Möglichkeit Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin und Bitcoin Cash per Kreditkarte zu kaufen. Binance: https://www.binance.com/de/r... Today's video covers how to profit off of Binance Funding in a multitude of ways. Happy profiting. Here is the link to the site: https://www.binance.com/en/f... Don't forget to subscribe and hit that notification '' & visit our base camp at https://cryptodaily.co.uk - Binance: Could BNB Replace Bitcoin? (2019) With the crypto market maturing, smaller ... Heute geht's um folgende Themen: Craig Wright muss 50% der Bitcoins an Kleiman abtreten, Binance startet Krypto Kredite & Dash Convention Europe Ticketverlosung. 1.) CRAIG WRIGHT REPORTEDLY MUST ...